Super Rich Game

1. Super Rich: The Greed Game
2. Super Rich Americans List
3. Super Rich Getting Richer
4. Super Rich Amount

The official source for NFL news, video highlights, fantasy football, game-day coverage, schedules, stats, scores and more.

1. Cited in Hans-Peter Martin and Harald Schumann, The Global Trap: Globalization and the Assault on Prosperity and Democracy (London and New York: 1997), p. 163.Google Scholar
2. US figures from Kennickell and Woodburn, op. cit. in note 5 previous chapter. British figures from John Hills, Income and Wealth (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Feb. 1995), p. 94.Google Scholar
3. It is impossible to provide reasonably accurate hourly wage rates for some countries, particularly China, but a measure of the huge discrepancy between living standards can be seen in per capita GNP figures (GNP per capita in 1992 US dollars): China $470, USA $23,240, UK $17,790, Japan $28,190, Germany $23,030, France $22,260. In the US the average hourly earnings of production and non-supervisory workers on private non-farm payrolls was $11,82 per hour for 34.4 hours per week in 1996, World Bank Atlas (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1995).Google Scholar
4. James Goldsmith, The Trap (London: 1994), p. 18.Google Scholar
5. The figures for 1994 were Germany 21.6, France 28.5 (1992 figure), Portugal 20.8, Netherlands 22.01, Sweden 27.5 and Britain 12.8. Eurostat, 1994.Google Scholar
6. Quoted in Robert Taylor, ‘Global Claptrap', Prospect, Dec. 1997.Google Scholar
7. William Greider, One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism (New York: 1997), p. 11.Google Scholar
8. ‘One World', The Economist, Schools Brief, 18–24 Oct. 1997.Google Scholar
9. Ibid.Google Scholar
10. See E. Swyngedouw, ‘Producing Futures: Global Finance as a geographical product', in P.W. Daniels, The Global Economy in Transition (London: 1966), p. 135.Google Scholar
11. See J. H. Dunning, The Globalization of Business (London and New York: 1993), p. 287.Google Scholar
12. Taylor, ‘Global Claptrap', op. cit.Google Scholar
13. See New Left Review, Dec. 1997.Google Scholar
14. See H. Brar, Imperialism (London: 1997).Google Scholar
15. W. Sengenberger and F. Wilkinson, ‘Globalization and Labour Standards', in J. Mitchie and J. G. Smith, Managing The Global Economy (Oxford and New York: 1995).Google Scholar
16. See ‘One World', The Economist, op. cit. On the amount of FDI, see Paul Hirst and Grahame Thompson, Globalisation in Question (London: 1996).Google Scholar
17. See Ankie Hoogvelt, Globalisation and the Post Colonial World: The New Political Economy of Development (London), p 87. The author also argues that the data used for this analysis is pre-1990.Google Scholar
18. See Brar, Imperialism, op. cit., pp. 86–9. An UNCTAD analysis of the regional distribution of world FDI inflows is instructive — after a dip in the late 1980s FDI investment in non-Western countries rose from 18.3 per cent to 35.2 per cent.Google Scholar
19. See UN, World Investment Report 1998 (New York: UN Publications Offices, 1998). Figures from this report were reported in the Financial Times, 11 Nov. 1998.Google Scholar
20. See Brar, Imperialism, op. cit.Google Scholar
21. Financial Times, 11 Nov. 1998.Google Scholar
22. See World Bank, World Atlas, op. cit., pp. 36–7.Google Scholar
23. Martin and Schumann, The Global Trap, op. cit., pp. 68–9.Google Scholar
24. See Newsweek, 3 Oct. 1994.Google Scholar
25. The Economist, 18 Oct. 1997.Google Scholar
26. Michael Lind, The Next American Nation: The New Nationalism and the Fourth American Revolution (New York: 1995), p. 203.Google Scholar
27. Yonghao Pu,' shelter From The Storm', Financial Times, 13 Jan, 1996.Google Scholar
28. Jeffrey Henderson, ‘Market Stalinism Going to the Wall', Guardian, 13 Jan. 1998, extracted from Grahame Thompson (ed.), Economic Integration in the Asia-Pacific (London: 1998).Google Scholar
29. John Gray, ‘Bill Rules the World — And I Don't Mean Clinton', Daily Express, 11 Sep. 1998, p. 190.Google Scholar
30. Robert Z. Lawrence, Single World: Divided Nations: International Trade and OECD Labor Markets (Paris: 1996), p. 128.Google Scholar
31. See Martin and Schumann, The Global Trap, op, cit., pp, 1–5.Google Scholar
32. See Tony Crosland, The Future Of Socialism (London: 1956)Google Scholar
33. Cited in Ralph Miliband, The State in Capitalist Society: the Analysis of the Western System of Power (London: 1973), p. 132.Google Scholar
34. Joe Rogaly, ‘Forget governments — companies rule, OK', Financial Times, 8–9 Nov, 1997.Google Scholar
35. These estimates, based upon a Conference Board of New York report, are cited in Mathew Horsman, After The Nation-State: Citizens, Tribalism and the New World Disorder (London: 1994), p. 201.Google Scholar
36. Sarah Anderson and John Kavanagh, International Herald Tribune, 23 Oct. 1996.Google Scholar
37. Robert Reich, The Work of Nations (New York: 1991), p. 110.Google Scholar
38. Ibid., p. 113.Google Scholar
39. Gray, ‘Bill Rules the World', op. cit., p. 82.Google Scholar
40. Ibid; Martin and Schumann, The Global Trap, op. cit., p. 111.Google Scholar
41. See David Greenway (ed.), Current Issues in International Trade Theory and Policy (New York: 1985), quotation from Ravi Batra, The Myth of Free Trade (New York: 1993), p. 157.Google Scholar
42. Report in Le Monde, 29 April, 1993, cited in Goldsmith, The Trap, op. cit., p. 20.Google Scholar
43. David Hale, ‘How the Rise of Global Pension Funds will Change the Global Economy in the 21st century', prepared for the 1997 Bank Credit Analyst Bermuda Conference, May, 1997, unpublished, p. 10.Google Scholar
44. John Scott, Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes (Oxford: 1997), p. 86.Google Scholar
45. Hale, ‘The Rise of Global Pension Funds', op. cit.Google Scholar
46. Ibid.Google Scholar

1. Super Rich: Game lover's store ร้านตัวแทนจำหน่าย PlayStation และ Nintendo สินค้า Gift Shop และของ.
2. The super-rich don't care about us. It will be their downfall 13 Feb 2015 Wealth over the edge: Singapore 7 Mar 2013 How the Swiss are turning against the super-rich 23 Jan 2013 Splits in the Singapore elite 2 Nov 2012 The Super-Rich and Us: Rich People VS Poor People UK 1/2 8 Jan 2015.
3. 손 쉽게 탭하여 바로바로 돈 벌기 경영 시뮬레이션 모바일 게임 슈퍼리치M에서 다 같이 갑부로 되어 보시죠! 게임 소개 방치형 경영 게임을 시작하자마자 저택만 터치하면 골드 획득 가능합니다! 또한, 로그아웃하셔도 오프라인 수입을 수령하실 수 있습니다.

Ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWI) are defined as having a net worth of at least US$30 million in constant 2018 dollars.^[1][2] It is the wealth segment above very-high-net-worth individuals (>$5 million) and high-net-worth-individuals (>$1 million). Although they constitute only 0.003% of the world's population (less than 1 in 33,000), they hold 13% of the world's total wealth.^[3] By 2017 there were 226,450 individuals designated as UHNWI representing an increase of 3.5% with their combined total wealth increasing to $27 trillion.^[4]

Definitions and ranking[edit]

Ultra high-net-worth individuals are defined as having a net worth of at least US$30 million in investable assets net of liabilities (after deducting residential and passion investments such as art, planes, yachts and real estate). At last count, there were 211,275 UHNW individuals in the world, with a total combined net worth of US$29.7 trillion.^{[RS 1][5]} Billionaires are a special category of UHNW individuals, having net worth in excess of US$1 billion. According to the Billionaire Census 2014, there were 2,325 billionaires in the world, with a combined net worth of US$7.3 trillion.^[6] In 2014, these individuals represented just over 1% of the world's UHNW population and 24% of the world's UHNW total wealth. The June 27, 2017 'World Ultra Wealth Report' analysed the state of the world's ultra high net worth (UHNW) population, or those with $30m or more in net worth. The number of UHNW individuals globally grew 3.5% to 226,450 individuals. Their combined total wealth increased by 1.5% to $27 trillion.^[4]

Reports[edit]

The 'World Ultra Wealth Report', on ultra high net worth (UHNW) populations—those with '$30m or more in net worth', which was published on June 27, 2017, 'this year revealed global growth of 3.5% to 226,450 individuals and a 1.5% increase of their total combined wealth to $27 trillion.'^[4]

World Ultra Wealth Report[edit]

The World Ultra Wealth Report 2013 was co-published by Wealth-X and UBS. The fifth edition of the report was published on June 27, 2017.^[4] Previous World Ultra Wealth Reports were published independently by Wealth-X, in 2011 and 2012 respectively.

UHNW distribution by wealth tier^[7]

Boston Consulting Group Global Wealth Report[edit]

The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 2014 Global Wealth Report,^{[RS 2]} shows that liquid wealth of the super-rich, referenced as Ultra-High-Net-Worth households, had increased by 20% in 2013. BCG uses a household definition of UHNW, which places only those with more than $100 million liquid financial wealth into the UHNW-category, more than the usual $30 million, with which the ultra-category had been created in 2007. According to BCG, about 15,000 households globally belong in this group of the super-rich. They control 5.5% of global financial wealth. 5,000 of them live in the US, followed by China, Britain and Germany. BCG expects the trend toward more concentrated wealth to continue unabated. While financial wealth of the sub-millionaires is expected to increase by 3.7% annually until 2019, the expected growth rate for the super-rich is 9.1%. The share of this group in global financial wealth would thus increase to 6.5% by 2019.^[8]

UHNW characteristics[edit]

By 2013, 65% of the world's UHNW population was self-made, as opposed to 19% who had inherited their fortune and 16% who had inherited and grown their wealth. These proportions change dramatically by gender. In the 2013 report, it was revealed that only 12% of the world's UHNW population is female, and of these, only 33% are self-made, as opposed to 70% of male UHNW.^[9] According to the same 2013 report, twenty-two percent of self-made UHNW individuals have derived their wealth from the finance, banking and investment. Almost 15% of individuals with inherited wealth are engaged in non-profit and social organisations.^[10]

As of 2014, Asia's growth was expected to continue,^[11] and this change in demographics has significant impact on the various organizations that target UHNW individuals, such as luxury companies, financial institutions, charities and universities. Sahara sands casino.

Billionaire Census[edit]

The Billionaire Census is a co-publication of Wealth-X and UBS.

In 2013 for example, the average net worth of the world's billionaire is US$3 billion, with a liquidity on average of 18% of net worth.^[12] 60% of the world's billionaires are self-made, 20% have inherited their fortune and 20% have both inherited and grown their wealth. 18% of the world's billionaires have derived their wealth from finance, banking and investment; as opposed to 9% from industrial conglomerates and 7% from the real estate industry.^[12] The average billionaire is 62 years old, and 89% of the world's billionaires are male. Approximately 68% of them have a bachelor's degree or higher levels of education.^[12]

UHNWI role in economies: luxury industry and UHNW individuals as consumers[edit]

UHNW individuals are of crucial importance not only to the finance, banking and investment industry; but also to luxury companies who target UHNW individuals, charities, universities and schools amongst others.^{[citation needed]} UHNW individuals are notable players in the field of philanthropy; many have their own private foundations and support a variety of causes, from education to poverty relief.

Financial institutions are known for their targeting of UHNW individuals, having specific parts of their bank designed to manage the wealth of their UHNW clients.^[2] In addition, research on the UHNW is particularly important with upcoming intergenerational wealth transfers in the UHNW population.^[13] For example, as of 2014, luxury companies typically target UHNW as a separate segment of their clientele. Daily Finance in 2014, projected that growth in UHNW population in Asia looked promising for the future of the luxury industry.^[14] The India's Economic Times said in 2014 that, despite wide report on the luxury industry's troubled year with China's luxury spenders, luxury industry experts continued to be optimistic for their long-term performance, especially from UHNW individuals.^[15] According to Savills and Wealth-X, in 2014, UHNW individuals are particularly relevant the real estate sector, with the total UHNW population's real estate holdings accounting for over US$5 trillion by 2014, or 3% of the world's real estate holdings. This is a huge proportion considering this population is only 0.003% of the world's population.^[16]

1. Cited in Hans-Peter Martin and Harald Schumann, The Global Trap: Globalization and the Assault on Prosperity and Democracy (London and New York: 1997), p. 163.Google Scholar
2. US figures from Kennickell and Woodburn, op. cit. in note 5 previous chapter. British figures from John Hills, Income and Wealth (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Feb. 1995), p. 94.Google Scholar
3. It is impossible to provide reasonably accurate hourly wage rates for some countries, particularly China, but a measure of the huge discrepancy between living standards can be seen in per capita GNP figures (GNP per capita in 1992 US dollars): China $470, USA $23,240, UK $17,790, Japan $28,190, Germany $23,030, France $22,260. In the US the average hourly earnings of production and non-supervisory workers on private non-farm payrolls was $11,82 per hour for 34.4 hours per week in 1996, World Bank Atlas (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1995).Google Scholar
4. James Goldsmith, The Trap (London: 1994), p. 18.Google Scholar
5. The figures for 1994 were Germany 21.6, France 28.5 (1992 figure), Portugal 20.8, Netherlands 22.01, Sweden 27.5 and Britain 12.8. Eurostat, 1994.Google Scholar
6. Quoted in Robert Taylor, ‘Global Claptrap', Prospect, Dec. 1997.Google Scholar
7. William Greider, One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism (New York: 1997), p. 11.Google Scholar
8. ‘One World', The Economist, Schools Brief, 18–24 Oct. 1997.Google Scholar
9. Ibid.Google Scholar
10. See E. Swyngedouw, ‘Producing Futures: Global Finance as a geographical product', in P.W. Daniels, The Global Economy in Transition (London: 1966), p. 135.Google Scholar
11. See J. H. Dunning, The Globalization of Business (London and New York: 1993), p. 287.Google Scholar
12. Taylor, ‘Global Claptrap', op. cit.Google Scholar
13. See New Left Review, Dec. 1997.Google Scholar
14. See H. Brar, Imperialism (London: 1997).Google Scholar
15. W. Sengenberger and F. Wilkinson, ‘Globalization and Labour Standards', in J. Mitchie and J. G. Smith, Managing The Global Economy (Oxford and New York: 1995).Google Scholar
16. See ‘One World', The Economist, op. cit. On the amount of FDI, see Paul Hirst and Grahame Thompson, Globalisation in Question (London: 1996).Google Scholar
17. See Ankie Hoogvelt, Globalisation and the Post Colonial World: The New Political Economy of Development (London), p 87. The author also argues that the data used for this analysis is pre-1990.Google Scholar
18. See Brar, Imperialism, op. cit., pp. 86–9. An UNCTAD analysis of the regional distribution of world FDI inflows is instructive — after a dip in the late 1980s FDI investment in non-Western countries rose from 18.3 per cent to 35.2 per cent.Google Scholar
19. See UN, World Investment Report 1998 (New York: UN Publications Offices, 1998). Figures from this report were reported in the Financial Times, 11 Nov. 1998.Google Scholar
20. See Brar, Imperialism, op. cit.Google Scholar
21. Financial Times, 11 Nov. 1998.Google Scholar
22. See World Bank, World Atlas, op. cit., pp. 36–7.Google Scholar
23. Martin and Schumann, The Global Trap, op. cit., pp. 68–9.Google Scholar
24. See Newsweek, 3 Oct. 1994.Google Scholar
25. The Economist, 18 Oct. 1997.Google Scholar
26. Michael Lind, The Next American Nation: The New Nationalism and the Fourth American Revolution (New York: 1995), p. 203.Google Scholar
27. Yonghao Pu,' shelter From The Storm', Financial Times, 13 Jan, 1996.Google Scholar
28. Jeffrey Henderson, ‘Market Stalinism Going to the Wall', Guardian, 13 Jan. 1998, extracted from Grahame Thompson (ed.), Economic Integration in the Asia-Pacific (London: 1998).Google Scholar
29. John Gray, ‘Bill Rules the World — And I Don't Mean Clinton', Daily Express, 11 Sep. 1998, p. 190.Google Scholar
30. Robert Z. Lawrence, Single World: Divided Nations: International Trade and OECD Labor Markets (Paris: 1996), p. 128.Google Scholar
31. See Martin and Schumann, The Global Trap, op, cit., pp, 1–5.Google Scholar
32. See Tony Crosland, The Future Of Socialism (London: 1956)Google Scholar
33. Cited in Ralph Miliband, The State in Capitalist Society: the Analysis of the Western System of Power (London: 1973), p. 132.Google Scholar
34. Joe Rogaly, ‘Forget governments — companies rule, OK', Financial Times, 8–9 Nov, 1997.Google Scholar
35. These estimates, based upon a Conference Board of New York report, are cited in Mathew Horsman, After The Nation-State: Citizens, Tribalism and the New World Disorder (London: 1994), p. 201.Google Scholar
36. Sarah Anderson and John Kavanagh, International Herald Tribune, 23 Oct. 1996.Google Scholar
37. Robert Reich, The Work of Nations (New York: 1991), p. 110.Google Scholar
38. Ibid., p. 113.Google Scholar
39. Gray, ‘Bill Rules the World', op. cit., p. 82.Google Scholar
40. Ibid; Martin and Schumann, The Global Trap, op. cit., p. 111.Google Scholar
41. See David Greenway (ed.), Current Issues in International Trade Theory and Policy (New York: 1985), quotation from Ravi Batra, The Myth of Free Trade (New York: 1993), p. 157.Google Scholar
42. Report in Le Monde, 29 April, 1993, cited in Goldsmith, The Trap, op. cit., p. 20.Google Scholar
43. David Hale, ‘How the Rise of Global Pension Funds will Change the Global Economy in the 21st century', prepared for the 1997 Bank Credit Analyst Bermuda Conference, May, 1997, unpublished, p. 10.Google Scholar
44. John Scott, Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes (Oxford: 1997), p. 86.Google Scholar
45. Hale, ‘The Rise of Global Pension Funds', op. cit.Google Scholar
46. Ibid.Google Scholar

1. Super Rich: Game lover's store ร้านตัวแทนจำหน่าย PlayStation และ Nintendo สินค้า Gift Shop และของ.
2. The super-rich don't care about us. It will be their downfall 13 Feb 2015 Wealth over the edge: Singapore 7 Mar 2013 How the Swiss are turning against the super-rich 23 Jan 2013 Splits in the Singapore elite 2 Nov 2012 The Super-Rich and Us: Rich People VS Poor People UK 1/2 8 Jan 2015.
3. 손 쉽게 탭하여 바로바로 돈 벌기 경영 시뮬레이션 모바일 게임 슈퍼리치M에서 다 같이 갑부로 되어 보시죠! 게임 소개 방치형 경영 게임을 시작하자마자 저택만 터치하면 골드 획득 가능합니다! 또한, 로그아웃하셔도 오프라인 수입을 수령하실 수 있습니다.

Ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWI) are defined as having a net worth of at least US$30 million in constant 2018 dollars.^[1][2] It is the wealth segment above very-high-net-worth individuals (>$5 million) and high-net-worth-individuals (>$1 million). Although they constitute only 0.003% of the world's population (less than 1 in 33,000), they hold 13% of the world's total wealth.^[3] By 2017 there were 226,450 individuals designated as UHNWI representing an increase of 3.5% with their combined total wealth increasing to $27 trillion.^[4]

Definitions and ranking[edit]

Ultra high-net-worth individuals are defined as having a net worth of at least US$30 million in investable assets net of liabilities (after deducting residential and passion investments such as art, planes, yachts and real estate). At last count, there were 211,275 UHNW individuals in the world, with a total combined net worth of US$29.7 trillion.^{[RS 1][5]} Billionaires are a special category of UHNW individuals, having net worth in excess of US$1 billion. According to the Billionaire Census 2014, there were 2,325 billionaires in the world, with a combined net worth of US$7.3 trillion.^[6] In 2014, these individuals represented just over 1% of the world's UHNW population and 24% of the world's UHNW total wealth. The June 27, 2017 'World Ultra Wealth Report' analysed the state of the world's ultra high net worth (UHNW) population, or those with $30m or more in net worth. The number of UHNW individuals globally grew 3.5% to 226,450 individuals. Their combined total wealth increased by 1.5% to $27 trillion.^[4]

Reports[edit]

The 'World Ultra Wealth Report', on ultra high net worth (UHNW) populations—those with '$30m or more in net worth', which was published on June 27, 2017, 'this year revealed global growth of 3.5% to 226,450 individuals and a 1.5% increase of their total combined wealth to $27 trillion.'^[4]

World Ultra Wealth Report[edit]

The World Ultra Wealth Report 2013 was co-published by Wealth-X and UBS. The fifth edition of the report was published on June 27, 2017.^[4] Previous World Ultra Wealth Reports were published independently by Wealth-X, in 2011 and 2012 respectively.

UHNW distribution by wealth tier^[7]

Boston Consulting Group Global Wealth Report[edit]

The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 2014 Global Wealth Report,^{[RS 2]} shows that liquid wealth of the super-rich, referenced as Ultra-High-Net-Worth households, had increased by 20% in 2013. BCG uses a household definition of UHNW, which places only those with more than $100 million liquid financial wealth into the UHNW-category, more than the usual $30 million, with which the ultra-category had been created in 2007. According to BCG, about 15,000 households globally belong in this group of the super-rich. They control 5.5% of global financial wealth. 5,000 of them live in the US, followed by China, Britain and Germany. BCG expects the trend toward more concentrated wealth to continue unabated. While financial wealth of the sub-millionaires is expected to increase by 3.7% annually until 2019, the expected growth rate for the super-rich is 9.1%. The share of this group in global financial wealth would thus increase to 6.5% by 2019.^[8]

UHNW characteristics[edit]

By 2013, 65% of the world's UHNW population was self-made, as opposed to 19% who had inherited their fortune and 16% who had inherited and grown their wealth. These proportions change dramatically by gender. In the 2013 report, it was revealed that only 12% of the world's UHNW population is female, and of these, only 33% are self-made, as opposed to 70% of male UHNW.^[9] According to the same 2013 report, twenty-two percent of self-made UHNW individuals have derived their wealth from the finance, banking and investment. Almost 15% of individuals with inherited wealth are engaged in non-profit and social organisations.^[10]

As of 2014, Asia's growth was expected to continue,^[11] and this change in demographics has significant impact on the various organizations that target UHNW individuals, such as luxury companies, financial institutions, charities and universities. Sahara sands casino.

Billionaire Census[edit]

The Billionaire Census is a co-publication of Wealth-X and UBS.

In 2013 for example, the average net worth of the world's billionaire is US$3 billion, with a liquidity on average of 18% of net worth.^[12] 60% of the world's billionaires are self-made, 20% have inherited their fortune and 20% have both inherited and grown their wealth. 18% of the world's billionaires have derived their wealth from finance, banking and investment; as opposed to 9% from industrial conglomerates and 7% from the real estate industry.^[12] The average billionaire is 62 years old, and 89% of the world's billionaires are male. Approximately 68% of them have a bachelor's degree or higher levels of education.^[12]

UHNWI role in economies: luxury industry and UHNW individuals as consumers[edit]

UHNW individuals are of crucial importance not only to the finance, banking and investment industry; but also to luxury companies who target UHNW individuals, charities, universities and schools amongst others.^{[citation needed]} UHNW individuals are notable players in the field of philanthropy; many have their own private foundations and support a variety of causes, from education to poverty relief.

Financial institutions are known for their targeting of UHNW individuals, having specific parts of their bank designed to manage the wealth of their UHNW clients.^[2] In addition, research on the UHNW is particularly important with upcoming intergenerational wealth transfers in the UHNW population.^[13] For example, as of 2014, luxury companies typically target UHNW as a separate segment of their clientele. Daily Finance in 2014, projected that growth in UHNW population in Asia looked promising for the future of the luxury industry.^[14] The India's Economic Times said in 2014 that, despite wide report on the luxury industry's troubled year with China's luxury spenders, luxury industry experts continued to be optimistic for their long-term performance, especially from UHNW individuals.^[15] According to Savills and Wealth-X, in 2014, UHNW individuals are particularly relevant the real estate sector, with the total UHNW population's real estate holdings accounting for over US$5 trillion by 2014, or 3% of the world's real estate holdings. This is a huge proportion considering this population is only 0.003% of the world's population.^[16]

Offshore bank[edit]

By 2012, according to Reuters, the UHNW individuals held $32 trillion in offshore havens.^{[RS 4]}

See also[edit]

Super Rich: The Greed Game

Reliable sources[edit]

Super Rich Americans List

1. ^'World's Ultra Wealthy Population Reaches All-Time Record'. WSJ Online. September 10, 2013. Archived from the original on September 14, 2013. Retrieved March 15, 2017.
2. ^'Global Wealth 2014: Riding a Wave of Growth'. https://www.bcg.com. Archived from the original on 2018-08-08. Retrieved 2018-08-20.External link in |website= (help)
3. ^'Top 10 countries with most ultra-high-net-worth individuals - Chinadaily.com.cn'. www.chinadaily.com.cn. Archived from the original on 2019-04-22. Retrieved 2019-04-22.
4. ^'Super rich hold $32 trillion in offshore havens'. Reuters. July 22, 2012. Retrieved 22 April 2020.

References (unconfirmed)[edit]

Super Rich Getting Richer

1. ^Wealth-X and UBS. World Ultra Wealth Report 2013. Archived from the original on 2014-02-08. Retrieved 2014-02-12.
2. ^ ^abGrzeskiewiecz, Grzegorz; Tomasz Kozlinski (15–17 June 2004). 'High Net Worth Individuals: The Clients of Private Banking'(PDF). 8th International Conference of Doctoral Students. Brno University of Technology (Czech Republic). Archived from the original(PDF) on 24 March 2012. Retrieved 6 March 2014.
3. ^Staff, Investopedia (2013-08-30). 'Ultra High Net Worth Individual (UHNWI)'. Investopedia. Archived from the original on 2017-10-26. Retrieved 2017-10-27.
4. ^ ^abcd'The World Ultra Wealth Report 2017'. Exclusive UHNWI Analysis (5 ed.). June 27, 2017. Archived from the original on November 16, 2017. Retrieved November 12, 2017.
5. ^Wealth-X and UBS. World Ultra Wealth Report 2014. p. 15. Archived from the original on 2015-12-18. Retrieved 2015-04-22.
6. ^Wealth-X and UBS. Billionaire Census 2014. p. 14. Archived from the original on 2017-03-13. Retrieved 2019-11-30.
7. ^Wealth-X and UBS. World Ultra Wealth Report 2013. p. 17. Archived from the original on 2014-02-08. Retrieved 2014-02-12.
8. ^BCG: Global Wealth 2014, Riding a Wave of Growth, The Boston Consulting Group, 9.6.2014
9. ^Wealth-X and UBS. World Ultra Wealth Report 2013 (Report). pp. 20–25. Archived from the original on 2014-02-08. Retrieved 2014-02-12.
10. ^Wealth-X and UBS. World Ultra Wealth Report 2013. pp. 20–25. Archived from the original on 2014-02-08. Retrieved 2014-02-12.
11. ^Fox, Jeff (2014-02-15). 'Helping the rich to become $100 trillion industry'. CNBC. Archived from the original on 2014-02-24. Retrieved 2017-09-17.
12. ^ ^abcWealth-X and UBS. Billionaire Census 2013. p. 84. Archived from the original on 2017-03-13. Retrieved 2019-11-30.
13. ^Foster, Lauren. 'Why Financial Advisers Need to Use Social Media'. Archived from the original on 2014-03-06. Retrieved 2014-03-06.
14. ^Kelesidou, Fani (5 March 2014). 'Why High-End Luxury Brands Are Losing Their Luster'. Daily Finance. Archived from the original on 6 March 2014. Retrieved 6 March 2014.
15. ^PTI (5 March 2014). 'Luxury industry optimistic about January–March quarter: Wealth-X survey'. India Times: Economic Times. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 6 March 2014.
16. ^Savills and Wealth-X (2014). Around the World in Dollars and Cents(PDF). p. 2. Archived(PDF) from the original on 2014-05-14. Retrieved 2014-03-06.

Super Rich Amount